Corpus

Search the Whole-Cell Imaging Corpus.

Filter the atlas, inspect records in card view, switch to table when you want a denser scan, and build a compare set from either view.

Use This Page

scanfilteropen recordscompare

Table view is best for scanning fast. Cards give more context. Compare selection now works in both views, and the drawer follows you until you clear it or open Compare.

Commonality Snapshot

A quick reading of the active result set. Click a trait to narrow the corpus to that subset; this is a frequency snapshot, not a quality ranking.

3 results filtered by organelle: mitochondria filtered by pair: flagella/cilia:vesicles

CardsTable
Export:CSVJSONBibTeXClear all

In this slice of the corpus, 3 dataset records match. ssTEM is the most common imaging family and flagella/cilia is the organelle that appears most often with count as the most common metric family. The most common captured organelle pair is flagella/cilia:mitochondria.

CompareDatasetCell TypeModalityVoxel Size (XY/Z nm)Sample SizeData Publicly Available
Salpingoeca rosetta whole-cell dataset (ssTEM)
Salpingoeca rosetta
Salpingoeca rosetta
ssTEMUnknown6Partial
Trypanosoma brucei whole-cell dataset (SBF-SEM)
Trypanosoma brucei
Trypanosoma brucei
SBF-SEM6.1 x 100 nm voxel size (XY/Z, 3D)1None indexed
Trypanosoma cruzi whole-cell dataset (ssTEM)
Trypanosoma cruzi
Trypanosoma cruzi
ssTEM200 x 200 nm voxel size (XY/Z, 3D) isotropic1None indexed
Compare Mode Preview

Comparison Summary

Moderate comparability; useful for targeted comparison with technical caveats.

Shared Fields

Cell Type: noneSpecies: noneOrganelles: flagella/cilia, mitochondria, nucleus, vesiclesDerived Organelle Pairs: flagella/cilia:mitochondria, flagella/cilia:nucleus, flagella/cilia:vesicles, mitochondria:nucleus, mitochondria:vesicles, nucleus:vesiclesMetric Families: noneComparator / Condition: developmental stageModality Family: EM

Key Differences

Modality: SBF-SEM, ssTEMSample Size Band: 1, 2-10Public Data Status: none, partialBoundary Confirmation: yes
Comparability Score:50 / 100
How It's Derived