Filter the atlas, inspect records in card view, switch to table when you want a denser scan, and build a compare set from either view.
Table view is best for scanning fast. Cards give more context. Compare selection now works in both views, and the drawer follows you until you clear it or open Compare.
A quick snapshot of the active result set. Click a trait to narrow the corpus to that subset.
In this slice of the corpus, 25 dataset records match. FIB-SEM is the most common imaging family and nucleus is the organelle that appears most often with count as the most common metric family. The most common captured organelle pair is mitochondria:nucleus.
Hair et al., 2024, PLOS Pathogens · SBF-SEM
Curation note: Some public data available. 41 in vitro, 10 sand fly-derived
Feng et al., 2023, Protoplasma · FIB-SEM
Curation note: 3+ per growth stage; 20 imaged, 15 segmented, but 3 per stage chosen for reconstruction
Jadav et al., 2023, Journal of Structural Biology · SBF-SEM
Mocaer et al., 2023, Journal of Cell Science · FIB-SEM
Curation note: Some public data available.
Burrell et al., 2022, PLoS Pathogens · SBF-SEM
Johkura et al., 2022, Microscopy · SBF-SEM
Curation note: 4 single-nuc, 4 binuc
Midorikawa et al., 2022, PNAS Nexus · FESEM
Curation note: 3L, 3D
Zechmann et al., 2022, Planta · FIB-SEM
Zechmann et al., 2022, Planta · ssTEM
Zechmann et al., 2022, Planta · FIB-SEM
Zechmann et al., 2022, Planta · ssTEM
Muller et al., 2021, Journal of Cell Biology · FIB-SEM
Curation note: Some public data available. 3 low-glucose, 4 high-glucose
Pollreisz et al., 2020, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. · SBF-SEM
Rudlaff et al., 2020, PLOS Pathogens · FIB-SEM
Curation note: Some public data available.
Decelle et al., 2019, Current Biology · FIB-SEM
Curation note: 8 symbiotic, 10 free-living; 2 representative cells shown
Laundon et al., 2019, PLOS Biology · ssTEM
Curation note: Some public data available. 3 colonial, 3 single
Laundon et al., 2019, PLOS Biology · ssTEM
Curation note: Some public data available.
Hughes et al., 2017, Journal of Cell Science · SBF-SEM
Curation note: (different n's for each quant)
Oi et al., 2017, Annals of Botany · FIB-SEM
Curation note: 1 visible 3D reconstruction, 2 addtl in supp movies (chloroplast counts)
Feng et al., 2016, Journal of Morphology · SBF-SEM
Curation note: Randomly selected spermatozoa
Girard-Dias et al., 2012, Histochemistry and Cell Biology · ET (cryo)
Curation note: (M&M mentions "35 tomograms (appox. 25 from epimastigotes and 10 from amastigotes and epimastigotes)"
Medeiros et al., 2012, PLoS One · FIB-SEM
Curation note: 10 quantified (Table 1); 1 or 2 whole cell images
Ramos et al., 2011, Cytometry A · ssTEM
Noske et al., 2008, Journal of Structural Biology · ET (Cryo)
Perktold et al., 2007, FEMS Yeast Res · ssTEM
Curation note: at least one chemically fixed and one cryofixed
High biological overlap with enough shared structure to justify direct comparison.